Monthly Archive for May, 2008

Analysing Hydro and Wind Investments

After creating the Tarik.ca Sustainable Renewable Power Index i’ve decided to further analyze and compare all the companies within the index to find the best investment opportunities. 

The Income Trusts in the index (demonstrated by the .UN ticker) provide much better value than the 2 non-trusts, which include Canadian Hydro Developers (TSX:KHD) and Plutonic Power (TSX:PCC). Canadian Hydro Developers is expensive relative to it’s earnings and it’s cash flow. Furthermore Plutonic Power does not have cash flow from operations.

Great Lakes Hydro (TSX:GLH.UN) is the most efficient company in the group with cash from operations yielding roughly 21% on equity. However it’s higher P/B ratio dilutes the benefits of having the highest internal returns.

Boralex Power and Income Fund (TSX:BPT.UN) provides the best value out of all the companies within the index. The over reaction to lower water flow in 2007, the one time income trust tax, temporary increases in biomass lumber prices and higher rates of goodwill amortization has resulted in shares declining over 50% in the last year. It is trading at 7.7 times Cash Flow from operations, equating to roughly two third of the average trust in the group which is around 12. At 7.7 times cash flow Boralex is trading at a multiple more akin to an oil company, not making justice to its safe assets. Furthermore Boralex roughly trades at 12 times earning, which is a steep discount relative to the group. I personally feel Boralex, just like CrestStreet is a takeover target due to the fact that it’s assets are very attractively priced at these low prices.

Q&A @ Tarik.ca : Understanding Income Trusts

Question
“Can trusts go broke or dissipate or do they go on for years like General Electric ?”

Answer
Income Trusts are businesses just like any other vanilla corporation. And like any other business, they can go broke or dissipate, however this is rare occurrence. Income Trusts were created to avoid the double taxation system, wherein the same corporate income is taxed twice, once at the corporate and once at the shareholder’s level. Income Trusts do not pay taxes at the corporate level but instead taxes are levied on the unitholders income from the company. In order to attain this tax status, income trusts must pay out a majority of their cash flow in order to maintain their trust status.

Income Trusts are as safe as their underling business. In order to be able to pay their large distributions, (which are 9% on average) Income Trusts typically operate in mature and stable industries which deliver strong and consistent cash flows.

However, there are some disadvantages as well to the income trust model. Unlike a regular corporation, earnings are not reinvested into the business. For unitholders this translates into lower opportunities for future growth and ultimately capital gains, with most gains coming from distribution income.

In Canada the average Oil & Gas Income Trust sits on 11 years of reserves. If the average Oil & Gas Trust did not expand reserves they would have to dissolve in a decade. Hence the average Oil & Gas trust spends about 20% of cash flow on capex (Capital Expenditures) for exploration and development, allowing the trust to achieve modest growth in production over the long term. In contrast a company like CI Financial Income Trust (A well established asset management firm) has a very small capex (Capital Expenditures) requirement and can grow organically as assets under management grows with time.

Because distributions are the main attraction to trusts, distribution stability and safety should be an investor’s principal concern. Trusts which cut their distributions have their share often plunge. Hence commodity producing companies are usually considered the “riskiest” of all trusts as commodity price fluctuations can put them in a situation where they might cut their distributions. This is also reflected in the DBRS’s (Dominion Bond Rating Service) policy of always rating commodity trusts lower than their non-commodity peers.

In order to avoid being stuck in a situation where a trust cuts their distribution one should look at the distribution payout ratio. As a rule of thumbs one should not invest in a commodity based Income Trust with a payout greater than 75% and one should not invest in a business/real estate trust with a payout greater than 95%. One should also screen for businesses with a high profitability as indicated with an ROE (Return on Equity) greater than 15%. And since cash flow is king one should look for stability and predictability in the cash flow statement in recent years.

Ultimately, when investing in Income Trusts one should expect small capital gains of 0 to 2% yearly on top of the 9% distribution yield yearly as income is paid out instead of being aggressively reinvested in the business. For these reasons Income Trusts have historically been a great retirement vehicle by providing current income with growth potential. Unfortunately the Canadian Government’s decision to start taxing trusts in 2011 will ultimately result in many trusts converting to corporations in 2011. Since this news has already been priced in, this development poses no threat to investors and is instead an opportunity to pick up great businesses at fair prices.

Tarik.ca Canadian Sustainable Renewable Power Index™

As fossil fuels become increasingly more expensive in the future as old fields deplete, while unconventional sources become increasingly common as global demand for energy keeps rising, electricity will play a critical role in powering the world. Recent advancements in battery and electric engine technologies as demonstrated in the new Think and Tesla automobiles demonstrate the economic and environmental potential of electric vehicles while not compromising speed or distance. As renewable power becomes cheaper relative to fossil fuels, the demand for electricity will rise at above trend growth. Renewable power from hydro and wind are stable, established, require no fuel and are ultimately cheap. Solar power is still many years away from being economically feasible.

The Tarik.ca Sustainable Renewable Power Index is a market cap weighted index which invests in Canadian companies which derive greater than 50% of their income from wind and hydro installations. The goal of the index is to capitalize on the growing importance of electricity in our energy mix.

Index Constituents (% Weighting)

21.6% – Great Lake Hydro Income Trust
21.3% – Canadian Hydro Developers
14.0% – Algonquin Power Income Trust
10.4% – Macquarie Power & Infrastructure Income Trust
8.7% – Innergex Income Trust
7.9% – Plutonics Power
7.6% – Boralex Power Income Fund
4.0% – Innergex Renewables
2.1% – Earth First Canada
1.6% – Western Wind
0.4% – Synex International Inc.
0.3% – Run of River Hydro Inc.

Index Performance (1 Year) : Click Below to Enlarge

Tarik.ca Fundamentals Canadian Equity Fund Up 26.89 %

Since Dec 18th, 2007, the Tarik.ca Fundamentals Canadian Equity Fund has returned 26.89 %

The Performance of Market Indices since inception:

S&P/TSX Composite Index : 12.80 %
S&P/TSX SmallCap Index : 7.57 %
S&P/TSX Income Trust Index : 20.83%
Dow Jones Industrial (USD) : -1.28%
Nasdaq (USD) : -1.41 %
FTSE All World ex-US (USD) : 1.83 %

The Tarik.ca Canadian Fundamental Fund has preformed remarkably well since inception on December 18th 2007. These are some of the significant highlights

ARC Energy Trust has increased distributions by 20%, making it the only Natural Gas weighted trust to increase distribution since late 2006.
Canadian Oil Sands Trust
has increased distributions twice since December, up a total 50%, due to it’s unhedged exposure to crude oil.
Royal Utilities
a Saskatchewan coal producer was bough out at a 25% premium, by Sherritt.
Potash Corp of Saskatchewan
has experienced strong performance due to strong potash prices.
Macquarie Power & Infrastucture
and Great Lakes Hydro are experiencing strong water flow in their Hydro facilities and strong cash flow.
Capvest
the closed end fund, has preformed very well as the discount to NAV has shrunk while the underlining NAV has performed well as income trusts have outperformed the TSX Index.
Fording Coal Trust
has performed extremely well as metallurgical coal prices have doubled in the last year as global steel production grow at above trend and as mine disruptions have been experienced in China and Australia.

Tarik.ca Canadian Equity Fund : Performance Graph (As of May 8, 2008)
Click below to enlarge

Tarik.ca Canadian Equity Fund : Investment Weightings (As of May 8, 2008)
Click below to enlarge


Tarik.ca Technical Trading System – Complete

After a long month of exams, I’m returning from my long hiatus away from Tarik.ca. My work on the Tarik.ca Technical Trading System is virtually complete. The system now trades all 16 Beta-Pro leveraged ETFs, including eight ETFs which return 200% the daily performance of it’s benchmark and 8 other ETFs which return 200% of the inverse daily performance of it’s benchmark. The system will switch between long and short positions on the ETF depending if the underlying benchmark is going up or going down based on trend following techniques. The system also incorporates a 3% trailing stop loss in order to lock in gains. While only 51% of trades were profitable, the system still managed to return 38% in the last year this is due tho the fact that the system was designed to cut losses and let profits run. A buy and hold strategy for all 16 ETFs would result in a small slow negative performance equal to ETF fees plus leverage loss due to the series of returns. Hence the system’s performance is inherently market neutral to the direction of the underlying basket of ETFs. However, market volatility is positively correlated with performance. Periods of high volatility are positively correlated with high returns and periods of low volatility are correlated with small returns. The system is relatively safe, as I’ve increased the number of ETFs trading, draw downs have decreased dramatically, while profits are virtually the same reducing non-systematic risk. Backtested the system experienced a maximum draw downs of 9% in a market environment where many benchmarks at one point experienced up to a 20% decline.

Disclaimer: The Tarik.ca Technical Trading System is only a back tested model and stated profits are virtual. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Tarik.ca is for educational purposes only and should not be taken as advise or solicitation, to buy or sell any financial product or security.

Click to Enlarge Image: